High Court of KeralaWP(C)/12832/2015disposed of

The Manager Kayalam A.L.P School v. State Of Kerala

2015-04-24Honourable Mr. Justice Anil K.Narendran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/4TH VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 12832 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- THE MANAGER, KAYALAM A.L.P SCHOOL AGED 66 YEARS P.O. PERUVAYAL, CALICUT-24.

BY ADVS.SRI.JIJI THOMAS SMT.SMITHA MATHEW SRI.P.R.ASHOK KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 303

2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KOZHIKODE - 673 001.

3. ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER KOZHIKODE RURAL, KOZHIKODE. 673 001.

4. HARITHA S., LPSA KAYALAM ALP SCHOOL, PO PERUVAYAL, CALICUT-24. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 12832 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 2.06.2014 EXT.P2 - A COPY OF THE REJECTION ORDER DATED 10/10/2014 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXT.P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN W.A.NO.812/2015 DATED 9/04/2015 EXT.P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER IN WPC NO.708/2015 DATED 9/01/2015 EXT.P5 - TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 14/03/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ NIL /TRUE COPY/ PS TO JUDGE

ANIL K.NARENDRAN, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No. 12832 of 2015 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th April, 2015

JUDGMENT

Petitioner, who is the Manager of Kayalam A.L.P.School, Kozhikode, has appointed the fourth respondent as LPSA by Exhibit P1 order of appointment. But, approval for the said appointment was rejected by the Assistant Educational Officer by Exhibit P2 order. Aggrieved by Exhibit P2 order, the petitioner has filed Exhibit P5 appeal before the second respondent. Now the grievance of the petitioner is that Exhibit P5 appeal is pending consideration before the second respondent.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents.

3. Considering the fact that Exhibit P5 statutory appeal filed by the petitioner is pending consideration before the second respondent, I deem it appropriate to

WP(C).12832/15 dispose of the Writ Petition directing the second respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exhibit P5 appeal as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, with notice to the petitioner.

ANIL K.NARENDRAN JUDGE vgs24/4/15