Biju D v. The Regional Transport Authority
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/8TH VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No.12914 of 2015 (L) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------- BIJU.D,S/O.DASAN,BINDHU BHAVANAM, MELEVETTOOR P.O,VARKALA,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV.SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT'S:
------------------------- 1.
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM - 691 001.
2.
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOLLAM.
R1 & R2 BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SRI.G.GOPAKUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
pk
WP(C).No.12914 of 2015 (L) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
------------------------------------ EXT.P-1:TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REGULAR PERMIT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.
EXT.P-2:TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DT.28.3.2015.
EXT.P-3:TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.29134 OF 2014 DATED 10.11.2014 ISSUED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:
NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.12914 of 2015 E - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of April 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner seeks issuance of a temporary permit pending consideration of a regular permit application, produced as Exts.P2 and P1 respectively. Admittedly the said applications were both filed on 28.3.2015, simultaneously. In consideration of the regular permit application or the temporary permit application, the respondent authority would take some time in getting the report of the Field Officer, as also considering the issue of any legal impediment being there, as also examination of the issue as to why objectional overlap of a notified route.
In such circumstances, there is no necessity of issuance of any warrant at this stage. The petitioner would be left with the
Writ Petition 12914/2015 remedy to approach this Court if there is any unnecessary delay in consideration of the application.
The Writ Petition stands dismissed.
sd/ K.VINOD CHANDRAN J, JUDGE dl