Sunitha v. Assistant Commissioner Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/19TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 12919 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- SUNITHA,AGED 48 YEARS,D/O.ANANDAN, KRISHNA KRIPA,PAAMBARM DESOM, PARIPILLY VILLAGE.

BY ADV.SRI.M.R.SASITH RESPONDENT'S:

------------------------- 1.

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CHATHANNUR,KOLLAM.

2.

CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAVOOR,KOLLAM.

3.

SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARIPPILLY, KOLLAM 4.

DEEPTHI,AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.BLAKRISHNAN OF BALAKRISHNAN MANDIRAM, KIDAVUTHUVILA DESOM,VARKALA VILLAGE, NOW RESIDING AT KUMAR BHAVAN, PANAYARA P.O,TACHODU DESOM CHEMMARUTHI VILLAGE.

*ADDITIONAL 5TH RESPONDENT IMPLEADED Addl.R5.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AYIROOR POLICE STATION - 690 001.

*ADDL.R5 IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 01.06.2015 IN IA NO.7105/15.

R1 TO R3 & R5 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

kp

WP(C).No.12919 of 2015 (L) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------ EXHIBIT P1:COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 6.4.2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P2:COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 6.4.2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3:COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 6.4.2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk

ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.C.No.12919 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of June 2015

J U D G M E N T

Ashok Bhushan, CJ Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

2.

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking police protection against the 4th respondent. Petitioner's case is that the 4th respondent, who is the friend of her husband, used to come to her house along with her husband. But, even after her husband deserted the petitioner, 4th respondent used to come and stay with her. When stay having been objected, 4th respondent has become enemical to the petitioner and has extended various threats to her.

3.

The learned Government Pleader, after obtaining instructions, submits that the 4th respondent is, at present,

at Gulf countries and there is no occasion to cause any obstruction or threat to the petitioner.

4.

In view of the submission made by the learned Government Pleader, we close this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate complaint before police as and when any offence or attempt to offence is committed by the 4th respondent and in that event, police shall look into the matter and take appropriate action, in accordance with law.

(sd/-) (ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE) (sd/-) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) jsr