C.T.Samuel v. Kerala State Electricity Board
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/3RD ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 12922 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------- C.T.SAMUEL, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O.CHERIYAN, PROPRIETOR, KANNILETH CABLE TV NET WORKS, NANGYARKULANGARA.P.O., PIN - 690 513 (RESIDING AT KANNILETH HOUSE, NADUVATTOM.P.O, PALLIPAD PANCHAYATH, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.) BY ADVS.SRI.M.R.SUDHEENDRAN SMT.A.AFREEZAA KHAN RESPONDENTS:
------------------------
1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, KSEB, TRIVANDRUM-695001.
2. THE DY.CHIEF ENGINEER, KSEB DIVISION OFFICE, MADHAVA JN, HARIPAD - 690 514.
3. ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION OFFICE, HARIPAD - 690 514.
4. PALLIPAD GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PALLIPAD-690514.
R1-R3 BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEVKUMAR K.GOPAL,SC,KSEB R4 BY ADV. SRI.M.R.ARUNKUMAR R4 BY ADV. SRI.P.SHAMMI NAVAS BY SRI.JAICE JACOB,SC,KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 12922 of 2015 (M) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SUPPLY 2005,PART-I EXT.P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTION OF THE 4HT RESPONDENT EXT.P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 19/3/2015 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25/3/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT LETTER ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER ON 26/4/2014 EXT.P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 13/4/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.
V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 12922 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of June, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner apprehends disconnection of electricity supply for the KIOSKS run by him. It is reported that the fourth respondent panchayat has taken a decision on 25.02.2015 expressing their no objection to the KIOSKS run by the petitioner.
2.
Ext.P6 representation put in by the petitioner in this regard is pending consideration with the second respondent. I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P6 representation with notice to the petitioner and the fourth respondent panchayat.
3.
The needful shall be done within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment. The electricity supply to the KIOSKS run by the petitioner shall not be snapped in the meanwhile.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd