M.M.Abdul Kareem v. Executive Engineer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JULY 2015/19TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 12969 of 2015 (U) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :
--------------------------
1. M.M.ABDUK KAREEM, MANAGING DIRECTOR SMART INDIA VILLAS PVT. LTD.
EDAPPALLY NORTH KOCHI-26.
2. NUCLEUS PREMIUM PROPERTIES PVT. LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR NISHAD N.P., NO.34/239C, NEAR MARIYA PARK, PADIVATTOM, EDAPPALLY P.O., KOCHI-20.
3. KUMARADAS MAILERUM, SYAMDAS VILLA, LINK INDIA RETREAT, VENNALA P.O., KOCHI-28.
4. SYAMALA DAS, W/O.KUMARADAS MAILERUM, SYAMDAS VILLA LINK INDIA RETREAT, VENNALA P.O., KOCHI-28.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN SMT.C.SEENA RESPONDENT(S) :
----------------------------
1. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION, KOCHI-16.
2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, WATER WORKS SUB DIVISION KALOOR, KOCHI-17.
3. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, WATER WORKS SECTION NO.1 KALOOR, KOCHI-17.
R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE MATHEW, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/-
WP(C).No. 12969 of 2015 (U) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :
------------------------------------- EXT P1 :
TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY DATED 26-5-2012 EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF SECOND PETITIONER.
EXT P2 :
TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE AGREEMENT FOR SALE DATED 26-5-2012 EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF THE SECOND PETITIONER.
EXT P3 :
TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE SALE DEED DATED 25-6-2014 EXECUTED IN FAVOUR OF THIRD AND FOURTH PETITIONERS.
EXT P4 :
TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 29-8-2014 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.12969 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of July, 2015.
JUDGMENT
The petitioners seek only a single connection to their apartment complex. The issue, whether different connections can be granted on the basis of the number of flats, is pending before the Division Bench. However, since the petitioners seek only a single domestic connection, as evidenced at Ext.P4, the same shall be considered in accordance with law.
In the said circumstances, Ext.P4 shall be considered within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE sp