Saranya Sukumaran v. The Sree Sankara University Sanskrit

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/8TH VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 12987 of 2015 (W) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- SARANYA SUKUMARAN, AGED 21 YEARS, D/O.A.T.SUKUMARAN, ANJILIMOOTTIL (H), KOOMBARA (P.O.), KOODARANJI (VIA), KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673 604.

BY ADV. SRI.K.DILIP RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. THE SREE SANKARA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, KALADY.

2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, SREE SANKARA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, KALADY.

3. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, THE SREE SANKARA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, KALADY.

4. THE HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DANCE, SREE SANKARA UNIVERSITY OF SANSKRIT, KALADY.

BY ADV. SRI.ARUN B.VARGHESE, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 12987 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 02.03.2015.

EXHIBIT-P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 28/3/2015. EXHIBIT-P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 16.02.2014.

EXHIBIT-P4: A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 06.02.2015. EXHIBIT-P5: A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR REVIEW DATED 22/04/2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 12987 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of April, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks condonation of the attendance shortage so as to enable the petitioner to participate in the examination.

2. However, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent University submits on instruction that the petitioner's shortage of attendance is beyond the condonable limit. The learned Standing Counsel also refers to the counter affidavit, filed today and served on the petitioner's counsel, showing that the petitioner's attendance shortage is beyond the condonable limit.

In such circumstance, nothing survives in the writ petition and the same is dismissed.

Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge