M/S. Kaippallil Rubbers Private Limited v. Commercial Tax Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/8TH VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 13056 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

-------------------------- M/S. KAIPPALLIL RUBBERS (P) LTD THANGALOOR P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY BABY SEBASTIAN, MANAGING DIRECTOR. BY ADVS.SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SRI.MAHESH V. MENON RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER - I 3RD CIRCLE, THRISSUR - 680 001.

2. INSPECTING ASST.COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THRISSUR - 680 001.

R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. S. SUDHEESH KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 13056 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXT.P-1:

COPY OF STATEMENT OF C FORMS RECEIVED FOR THE YEAR 2010 - 11.

EXT.P1(a):

COPY OF STATEMENT OF C FORMS RECEIVED FOR THE YEAR 2011 - 12.

EXT.P1(b):

COPY OF STATEMENT OF C FORMS RECEIVED FOR THE YEAR 2012 - 13.

EXT.P1(c):

COPY OF STATEMENT OF C FORMS RECEIVED FOR THE YEAR 2013 - 14.

EXT.P-2:

COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 29-12-2014.

EXT.P2(a):

COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 8-1-2015.

EXT.P2(b):

COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 8-1-2015.

EXT.P2(c):

COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 8-1-2015.

EXT.P-3:

COPY OF LETTER SUBMITTED BY THE ACCOUNTANT OF THE PETITIONER DATED 23-2-2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.13056 of 2015 E - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 28th day of April 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that the C-forms, which were recovered subsequent to the assessment order are not being considered. It would be ideal for the petitioner to file a rectification application before the appropriate authority. The Writ Petition (Civil) is closed, leaving such liberty. sd/ K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE