High Court of KeralaWP(C)/13101/2015disposed of

P.N.Ashokkumar v. The Secretary

2015-04-28Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/8TH VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 13101 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- P.N.ASHOKKUMAR, PUTHENPURA HOUSE, PINDIMANA P.O, KOTHAMANGALAM.

BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENT :

--------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MUVATTUPUZHA, PIN -686 661 BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.JAMAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 13101 of 2015 (K) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PROPOSED TIMINGS SUGGESTED BY THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH THE REGULAR PERMIT APPLICATION EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MUVATTUPUZHA DATED 13-2-2015 GRANTING REGULAR PERMIT IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION PARTICULARS IN RESPECT OF STAGE CARRIAGE KL-08/V 619 EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE 4 MONTHS TEMPORARY PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 12-2-2015 EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTION PASSED BY KAVALANGADU GRAMA PANCHAYATH DATED 23-03-2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C).No.13101 of 2015 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ==== Dated this the 28th day of April, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has been granted regular permit as per Ext.P2 on 13.02.2015. But the same is not yet issued since the settlement of timing is not finalised. Just prior to the grant of the permit, the petitioner also had made an application, Ext.P4, for temporary permit for a period of four months. The petitioner seeks for expeditious consideration of Ext.P4. Considering the fact that the regular permit has already been granted and is not issued only for reason of the settlement of timings having not been finalised, it is only proper that the temporary permit application be considered expeditiously, at any rate, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. If settlement of timing is not made within the said three weeks, then the temporary permit shall be

W.P.(C).No.13101 of 2015 issued on the proposed timings, subject, however, to finalisation being made in accordance with law by the Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Muvattupuzha. The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE.

stu