High Court of KeralaWP(C)/13459/2015disposed of

Ushakumari v. The Secretary

2015-05-05Honourable Smt. Justice P.V.Asha4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF MAY 2015/15TH VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 13459 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- USHAKUMARI, VADAKKAPULLAMPALLY HOUSE, CMC-01 CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------- THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ALAPPUZHA 688001.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.ABDUL KHADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 13459 of 2015 (F) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:

A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 9.3.2015 EXHIBIT P2:

A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 6.3.2015 IN WPC 6563 OF 2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

P.V. ASHA, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.13459 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of May, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner in the above writ petition is a regular stage carriage permit holder operating vehicle bearing Registration No.KL-05/L 4782 in the route Alappuzha-Ernakulam. The petitioner has filed an application for revisal of timings vide Ext.P1 application date 09.03.2015. The petitioner, in fact, seeks a particular slot, which is said to be vacant. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions, would contend that one another person has also sought for the same vacant timings. Preference, if any, will have to be considered by the Authority. The petitioner prays for an expeditious consideration of her application. If Ext.P1 application has been received in original in the office of the respondent, the respondent shall, within one week of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, display public notice in the notice board of the office of the respondent and shall then consider the

W.P.(C) No.13459 of 2015 prayer of the petitioner, in accordance with law, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of publication of the above notice. Needless to say the petitioner and any other rival operator who objects to the revision shall be heard before such consideration. The revision if made shall also be subject to any further revision made as per D3 Circular. Writ petition is disposed of as above.

P.V. ASHA, JUDGE sp