High Court of KeralaWP(C)/13524/2015disposed of

Shibu K v. Kerala Veterinary

2015-06-17Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/27TH JYAISHTA, 1937 ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------

1. SHIBU K., AGED 44 YEARS, S/O S.KUNJU KUNJU CHETTITHODI, VADAKKATHIL VEEDU, VAKKOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN:695 308.

2. ARUN RAJ R., AGED 20 YEARS, S/O B.RAJENDRAN PILLAI, RAJ MANDIRAM, THANNIKKAMUKKU, PERINAD P.O., KOLLAM, PIN:691 601.

3. MANOHARAN V., AGED 44 YEARS, S/O LATE KUNHANBU V., NITTADUKKAM HOUSE, NEAR DURGA H.S. SCHOOL, KANHANAD P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN:671 315.

4. VINOD V., AGED 46 YEARS, S/O K.VIJAYAN, PAROOR HOUSE, PATHIYOOR HOSUE, KAREELAKULANGARA P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PIN:690 572. 5.

NASEEMA, AGED 43 YEARS, D/O ALI KOLAKKATHIL, CHAMMANKADAVU, P.O. KODUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN:676 504.

BINU SUDHAKAR, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O T. SUDHAKARAN, VISWABHARATHY, MANACKADU, NEW NAGAR-42, VADAKKEVILA P.O., KOLLAM, PIN:691 010.

SYLAJA DEVI A.K., AGED 48 YEARS, D/O LATE KRISHNAN KUTTY A., THEVANANTHAVARAMP VEEDU, KULATHUR, UCHAKKADA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN:695 506.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR SMT.P.R.SOPHIYA.

Contd...

RESPONDENT(S):

-------------

1. KERALA VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR, POOKODE, LAKKIDI P.O., WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN:673 576.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF ACADEMIC & RESEARCH COLLEGE OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCE UNIVDERSITY POOKODE, LAKKIDI P.O., WAYANAD DISTRICT PIN:673 576.

3. THE DEAN, COLLEGE OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, POOKODE, LAKKIDI P.O., WAYANAD DISTRICT, PIN:673 576.

BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI,SC,K.V & A.S. UTY. & BY SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rvs.

APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

----------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25.08.2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 20.10.2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 28.04.2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 28.11.2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 28.11.2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P6: TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 27.3.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS AND 2 OTHERS TO 2ND RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P7: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY 2013-15 BATCH STUDENTS IN DAIRY SCIENCE TO 3RD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

----------------------- NIL.

/TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE RVS.

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 13524 of 2015 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of June, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioners who are final semester students of 2 year Diploma Course in Diary Science of 2013-2015 batch, allege that the students of 2013-2015 batch had raised complaints against the Course Director due to her misbehaviour. Due to that grudge, she used to threat the petitioners that they should face their fate in viva-voce examination. The petitioners further allege that they along with three others filed Ext.P6 complaint before the second respondent stating the details of regularities committed in the viva voice examination and an enquiry has been ordered on Ext.P6, which is going on. The grievance of the petitioners is that in spite of the pendency of the enquiry, the date of written examination was fixed in a haste and it is under process of completion. 2.

Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the

W.P.(C) No. 13524 of 2015 -2learned Standing Counsel for the respondent University on instructions submitted that the viva voce examination has been fixed and the petitioners complaints have been cancelled even before filing of this writ petition and a fresh examination was ordered on the basis of the interim order passed therein. In the light of the above, this writ petition is disposed of permitting the respondent University to conduct the viva voce examination without any further delay.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE Scl.