High Court of KeralaWP(C)/13645/2015disposed of

K.G.Gee Varghese v. The District Collector

2015-05-08Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF MAY 2015/18TH VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 13645 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- K.G.GEE VARGHESE, KATTUNILATHU PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, NIRANAM CENTRAL P.O., THIRUVALLA, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER THOMAS VARGHESE, KATTUNILATHU PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, NIRANAM CENTRAL P.O., THIRUVALLA.

BY ADVS.SRI.T.P.PRADEEP SRI.P.K.SATHEES KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, PATHANAMTHITTA - 689 645.

2. THE R.D.O., REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, THIRUVALLA - 689 101.

3. AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, KRISHI BAVAN, NIRANAM P.O. - 689 621.

4. THE SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.FAZIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 13645 of 2015 (E) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE FIELD INSPECTIN REPORT OF THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER DATED 9/4/2015.

P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 26/4/2015. P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE INFORMATION OBTAINED ON 30/5/2015 FROM THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 4/5/2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

******************************************************* W.P.(C) No.13645 of 2015 ******************************************************* Dated this the 8th day of May, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached the 4th respondent in a revision under Section 28 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act.

In view of the pendency of Ext.P4 before the 4th respondent, there shall be a direction to the 4th respondent to consider the same within a period of two months after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Till then, status quo shall be maintained.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln