High Court of KeralaWP(C)/13705/2015disposed of

Rinshith v. The Sub Inspector Of Police, Kodungallur Police Station

2015-05-08Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF MAY 2015/18TH VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 13705 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- RINSHITH, S/O.SASI, AGED 23 YEARS, AREETHODIKAYIL PARAMBU, POOVATTUPARAMBU P.O., PERUVAYAL VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE TALUK, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT, (OWNER OF THE LORRY BEARING REGISTRATION NO. KL-11-W-8111).

BY ADV. SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ.

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODUNGALLUR POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 001.

2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 001.

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 001.

4. THE DIRECTOR, MINING AND GEOLOGY, OFFICE OF THE MINING AND GEOLOGY, KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.P. FAZIL.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WP(C).No. 13705 of 2015 (K) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT DATED 31.03.2015 NO.778 OF KODUNGALLUR POLICE STATION. EXT.P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 09.02.2015 IN WP(C).NO.4051 OF 2015.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

******************************************************* W.P.(C) No.13705 of 2015 ******************************************************* Dated this the 8th day of May, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner's vehicle bearing registration No.KL-11W-8111 has been seized by the first respondent alleging transportation of river sand. According to the petitioner, the sand seized is only ordinary sand and not river sand. Immediately after the seizure of the vehicle, the petitioner approached the second respondent to get the sand tested with the 4th respondent to find out whether it is river sand or ordinary sand. In spite of repeated requests, the first and second respondents have not taken any steps to get it done.

2. Having regard to the factual situation, this Court is of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of as under:- The second respondent shall take the sample of the sand seized and send the same to the 4th respondent within a

W.P.(C) No.13705 of 2015 2 period of 'one week'. The 4th respondent shall send its report, based on such sample, within a period of 'three weeks'. The second respondent based on the above report shall finalise the proceedings within a period of 'two weeks' thereafter. The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the second respondent for further steps.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln