High Court of KeralaWP(C)/13727/2015disposed of

Abdul Gafoor v. The Local Level Monotiring Committee For Mankara Panchayat

2015-05-08Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF MAY 2015/18TH VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 13727 of 2015 (M) ----------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- ABDUL GAFOOR, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.BAVA, ALLINGAL HOUSE, NAGARIPURAM P.O., PATHIRIPALA, PALAKKAD.

BY ADVS.SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN SMT.SHAMSEERA. C.ASHRAF RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. THE LOCAL LEVEL MONOTIRING COMMITTEE FOR MANKARA PANCHAYAT, PALAKKAD, CONSTITUTED UNDER THE CONSERVATION OF PADDY AND WETLAND ACT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CONVENOR, THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, MANKARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN - 678 613.

2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MANKARA VILLAGE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 613.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.FAZIL P.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 13727 of 2015 (M) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1. A TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED 25/3/2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P2. A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 18/3/2009 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT IN WPC 8644/2009.

EXT.P3. A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 27TH MAY, 2009 OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALAKKAD.

EXT.P4. A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 4TH MARCH, 2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No.13727 OF 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of May, 2015

JUDGMENT

The limited prayer in the writ petition is to direct the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P4 representation without any further delay.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials available on record.

3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass appropraite orders on Ext.P4 representation, in accordance with law, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Writ petition is disposed of.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE jes