High Court of KeralaWP(C)/13732/2015disposed of

Smeeraj B.S v. Corporation Of Thiruvananthapuram

2015-05-08Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF MAY 2015/18TH VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 13732 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- SMEERAJ B.S, S/O.LATE BABU, AGED 31 YEARS, CONTRACTOR, KALLUVILA VEEDU, PATTUVILAKOM, KATTAYIKONAM. P.O, KAZHAKKOOTTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 584.

BY ADVS.SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA, SRI.P.T.ABHILASH.

RESPONDENTS:

------------------------

1. CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION COUNCIL, REPRESENTED BY ITS MAYOR.

OFFICE OF THE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM CORPORATION. PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.

3. CORPORATION ENGINEER, CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PALAYAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.

BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR, SC.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WP(C).No. 13732 of 2015 (N) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SELECTION NOTICE DATED 21.01.2012 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE FILE PERTAINING TO THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK INVOLVED IN THE AGREEMENT DATED 30.01.2012, MAINTAINED AT THE OFFICE OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 04.02.2013 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST AND 3RD RESPONDENTS. EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19.01.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST AND 3RD RESPONDENTS. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C)No.13732 OF 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 8th day of May, 2015

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed challenging the delay on the part of the respondents in drawing the final bill and disbursing the admitted amount due to the petitioner for the work completed by the petitioner. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, Ext.P4 representation is pending consideration before the first respondent.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials available on record.

3. In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider and pass appropraite orders on Ext.P4 representation, in accordance with law, as early as possible, at any rate, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Writ petition is disposed of.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE jes