High Court of KeralaWP(C)/13742/2015disposed of

M.K.Santhosh v. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

2015-09-03Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/12TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 13742 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

------------------ M.K.SANTHOSH S/O.KRISHNAN, MUPRAPPADAVIL HOUSE, VAIKKARA P.O., ASAMANNOOR, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S):

------------------ 1.

THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM - 682 011.

THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MUVATTUPUZHA - 686 661.

SANTHOSH.V.K., VATHUPARAMBIL HOUSE INCHATHOTTY P.O., KOTHAMANGALAM - 686 681.

R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK R BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.ANITHA RAVINDRAN. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 13742 of 2015 (P) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------- EXHBIIT P-1 TRUE COPY OF THE RC BOOK OF THE VEHICLE KL-49 7479. EXHBITI P-2 TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT ISSUED TO PETITIONER EXHBIIT P-3 TRUE EXTRACT OF THE TIMINGS ISSUED TO PETITIONER'S SERVICE EXHBIIT P-4 TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS DATED 6-1-2015 EXHBITI P-5 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION IN MVARP NO 18/15 EXHBIIT P-6 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN MVARP NO 18/15 DT 4-2-15 EXHBIIT P-7 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.A NO 2877/2009 DATED 18-12-2009 EXHBIIT P-8 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN WP(C) NO 3773/2010 DATED 8-2-2010 EXHIBIT P-9 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN W.P.(C) NO.21236/2013 DATED 27.8.2013 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------ EXT.R3 (a) A TRUE COPY OF THE RESOLUTION PASSED BY THE KUTTAMPUZHA GRAMA PANCHAYAT ON 30.6.2015.

EXT.R3(b) A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 17.7.2015 //TRUE COPY// P.S. JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.13742 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Both sides agree that a fresh timing conference can be convened by the first respondent with notice to all operators on the route. The same shall be done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

2. The interim order in vogue in this writ petition would continue to operate till such time. The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj.