← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/13852/2015disposed of

Shaji Kuruvilla v. The Regional Transport Authority

2015-05-12Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MAY 2015/22ND VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 13852 of 2015 (F) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S) :

-------------------------

1. SHAJI KURUVILLA, SUSAMMA VILASAM, KUMARAKOM P.O., KOTTAYAM.

2. SMT.CHELSIA THERESA GEORGE, D/O.LATE GEORGE CHERIAN, PANACHIKALAYIL HOUSE, VETTIMUKAL P.O., ETTUMANOOR, KOTTAYAM.

BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM-686 002.

2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOTTAYAM-686 002. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.A.MOHAMMED SAVAD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 13852 of 2015 (F) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE 1ST PETITIONER OF THE PERMIT DATED 11.10.2012.

EXHIBIT-P2: TRUE COPY OF THE EXISTING TEMPORARY PERMIT OF THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 16.12.2014.

EXHIBIT-P3: TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT APPLICATION FILED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER DATED 10.04.2015.

EXHIBIT-P4: TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY PERMIT APPLICATION FILED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED 10.04.2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

******************************************************* W.P.(C) No.13852 of 2015 ******************************************************* Dated this the 12th day of May, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached the respondents by Ext.P3 and P4 applications for the grant of issuing temporary permits on the route Kottayam-Ambaithode and back with stage carriages KL-5/AF 3699 and KL-5/AF 3434 alternatively as Super Express or otherwise as limited stop ordinary service etc. There shall be a direction to the second respondent to consider the same after issuing notice to the KSRTC and the petitioner within a period of two months.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln