Anosh Mathews T. v. Central Provident Fund Commnr.& Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/26TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 17792 of 2010 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- ANOSH MATHEWS.T., THYKOOTHATHYL HOUSE, VENUS GARDENS, MENON PARAMBU ROAD, EDAPALLY P.O. COCHIN-682 024.

BY ADV. SRI.BINNY THOMAS RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. CENTRAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, 14, BHIKAIJI CAMA PLACE, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN NEW DELHI-110 066.

2. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, KUKATPALLY, 21/48/18 BALAJI NAGAR, HYDERABAD- 500 072.

3. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN, BARKATPURA, HYDERABAD-500 027.

4. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, PROVIDENT FUND OFFICE, ERANHIPALAM, CALICUT.

5. CHIEF VIGILANCE OFFICER, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION, 14 BHIKAIJI CAMA PLACE, BHAVISHYA NIDHI BHAVAN NEW DLHI- 110 066.

R1 TO 5 BY ADVS. SRI.N.N. SUGUNAPALAN, SC, P.F. SRI.THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL SMT.T.N.GIRIJA, SC,EPF ORGANISATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 17792 of 2010 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of January, 2015

J U D G M E N T

There is no appearance for the petitioner. The respondent Organisation submits that the matter has become infructuous. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj