High Court of KeralaWP(C)/16594/2013closed

Zameena.A v. The District Superintendent Of Police

2015-11-06Honourable Mr.Justice A.M.Shaffique,Honourable The Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/15TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 16594 of 2013 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:

------------------------------------------- ZAMEENA.A AGED 35 YEARS D/O.IBRAHIM P , RINGS APARTMENTS, CHETTAMKUNNU, THALASSERY BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF SRI.V.R.NASAR RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

------------------------------------------------

1. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KANNUR-670003

2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF PO LICE THALASSERY-670101

3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THALASSERY-670101

4. RASHEED T S/O.ABDUL RAHIMAN, MABROOKM KADIRUR, UKKAS MOTTA, THALASSERY-670101 R1-3 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C. R. SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 16594 of 2013 (Y) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:-TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DTD 18/6/2013 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXT.P2:-TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DTD NIL SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P3:-TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD 29/4/2013 PASSED BY THE FAMILY COURT, THALASSERY IN OP NO 602/2012 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGEMENT sou.

ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J -------------------------------------------------------------- W.P(C). No. 16594 of 2013 --------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of November, 2015

JUDGMENT

Shaffique, J This writ petition has been filed alleging that the creditors of her husband are unnecessarily harassing the petitioner and children. Her husband is the fourth respondent in the writ petition.

2. Learned Government Pleader submits that police enquiry do not reveal any untoward as alleged by the petitioner.

3. Hence we close the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the police, if there is any further complaint.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE sou.6/11/15 // TRUE COPY //