High Court of KeralaWP(C)/14196/2015disposed of

Krishnakumar v. The Station House Officer

2015-05-12Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MAY 2015/22ND VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 14196 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- KRISHNAKUMAR, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.SETHUMADHAVAN, KANDAMANGALATH HOUSE, ARAKKUPARAMB P.O., PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM. BY ADVS.SRI.C.K.SREEJITH SMT.MARY RANZOM LOUIZ RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SREEKRISHNAPURAM POLICE STATION, OTTAPALAM, PALAKKAD- 679 101.

2. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, OTTAPPALAM, PALAKKAD DISTRICT- 679 101.

3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD DISTRICT- 678 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMMED SAVAD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 14196 of 2015 (Y) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE SEIZURE MAHAZAR DATED 31/03/2014. P2:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, OTTAPALAM DATED 01/09/2014.

P3:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR U/S.23B OF THE KERALA PROTECTION OF RIVER BANKS AND REGULATION OF REMOVAL OF SAND ACT P4:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL U/S.23 C OF KERALA PROTECTION OF RIVER BANKS AND REGULATION OF REMOVAL OF SAND ACT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No.14196 of 2015 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 12 th day of May, 2015

JUDGMENT

Petitioner aggrieved by orders passed under the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act approached District Court, Palakkad in Criminal Appeal No.99/2015. The petitioner seeks interim custody of the vehicle ordered to be confiscated under the above Act.

2. In view of the pendency of the Criminal Appeal, if the petitioner moves an application for interim custody before the District & Sessions Court, the same shall be considered by the Court within one month from the date of filing such application. Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE sj