K.P.Rajeevan v. Kseb
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2015/31ST VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 14199 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------ K.P.RAJEEVAN, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.PADMANABHAN, STAR VISION CABLE, EROOR, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) SMT.P.R.REENA RESPONDENTS:
-----------------------
1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VAIDYUTHI BHAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN-695 004.
2. CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION OFFICE, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYTTILA, ERNAKULAM PIN-682 020.
3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION OFFICE, THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM PIN-682301.
4. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, KSEB, CHOTTANIKKARA PIN-682 351.
5. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION OFFICE, KSEB, THRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682 301.
BY SRI.JAICE JACOB,SC,KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 14199 of 2015 (Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXT.P1 :
TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 3320/2015 DT.3-2-2015. EXT.P2 :
TRUE COPY OF THE BOARD ORDER DT.31-12-2014 ISSUED BY THE ELECTRICITY BOARD.
EXT.P3 :
TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY R3 TO THE PETITIONER DT.17-4-2015.
EXT.P3(A) :
TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY R3 TO THE PETITIONER DT.18-4-2015.
EXT.P4 :
TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 DT.30-4-2015.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.
V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 14199 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 21st day of May, 2015
JUDGMENT
The pole rental charges demanded for alleged unauthorised drawing of television cables is impugned. The dispute in this regard has to be resolved by the second respondent as per the terms of the agreement entered into between the parties. Ext.P4 representation filed by the petitioner in this regard is pending consideration with the second respondent.
2.
I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P4 representation with notice to the petitioner. The same shall be done within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The television cables drawn by the petitioner shall not be dismantled in the meanwhile on his depositing one half of the amount demanded under Exts.P3 and P3(a) notices.
3.
The amount shall be deposited within a period of one month from today before the third respondent and the receipt produced before the second respondent. The Writ Petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd