High Court of KeralaWP(C)/18552/2009closed

V.S.Boosari v. The State Of Kerala

2015-10-01Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/9TH ASWINA, 1937 W.P.(C).No.18552 of 2009 (L) --------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):- -------------------------- V.S.BOOSARI, JUNIOR MANAGER (MARKETING AND INSPECTION), KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, TALUK DEPOT, CHAVAKKADU, PUNALUR.

BY ADVS.SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ SRI.S.BIJU (KIZHAKKANELA).

RESPONDENT(S):- ----------------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. THE DIRECTOR, CIVIL SUPPLLIES DEPARTMENT, COMMISSIONERATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

3. THE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF CIVIL SUPPLLIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

4. KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.JAMAL.

R4 BY STANDING COUNSEL SMT.MOLLY JACOB.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-

W.P.(C).NO.18552 OF 2009-L APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.05.2008 IN C.C. NO.906 OF 2002 PASSED BY THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-I, PUNALUR.

EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 04.11.2008 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO.(CS) C2-25374/09(1) DATED 04.06.2009 ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 27.06.2009 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE THIRD RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- ----------------------------------------- NIL.

Vku/- [ true copy ]

K. Vinod Chandran, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.18552 of 2009-L --------------------------------------- Dated this the 01st day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner challenges the suspension, which, as per the counter affidavit, has been regularised. In such circumstance, nothing survives in the writ petition. The writ petition would stand closed.

Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran Judge.

vku/- [ true copy ]