High Court of KeralaWP(C)/14303/2015disposed of

Joshy Melayil T.A. v. The State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority

2015-05-12Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MAY 2015/22ND VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 14303 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :- ------------------

1. JOSHY MELAYIL T.A.

THARAKAN HOUSE, KOONAMMUCHI P.O, THRISSUR-680 504

2. JOBY T.A THARAKAN HOUSE, KOONAMMUCHI P.O THRISSUR-680 504.

BY ADV. SRI.K.B.GANGESH RESPONDENT(S) :- -----------------

1. THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY DIRECTORATE OF ENVIORNMENTAL AND CLIMATIC CHANGE PALLIMUKK, PETTA P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 024

2. THE GEOLOGIST, DISTRICT OFFICE OF GEOLOGY, AYYANTHOLE THRISSUR-680 003

3. THE DISTRICT COLELCTOR, COLLECTORATE, AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MOHAMED SHAFI M.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

jvt

WP(C).No. 14303 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :- ---------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF DOCUMENT NO 3314/2011 OF MUNDUR SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE DATED 11-10-2011.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF LETTER DATED 03-02-2014 SUBMITTED BY THE KERALA LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 16-06-2014.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE CALL LETTER FOR HEARING ON 05-07-2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ON 25-06-2014.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :- NIL ------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.14303 of 2015 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of May 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners submitted application for environmental clearance before the first respondent. The said application was returned for rectification of defects and the same was resubmitted on 16.6.2014. On account of delay in considering the application, the petitioners have approached this Court. 2.

Considering the facts and circumstances, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to take up the application submitted by the petitioners in any of the ensuing two meetings. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd /- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE J UDGE Jvt