Sreekumari C.L. v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH 2015/12TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No.14573 of 2014 (V) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER:
------------------- SREEKUMARI C.L,D/O.THE LATE PARAMESWARAN, MELATHIL HOUSE,MURAMEL NANNATTUKAVU, POTTENCODE.P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
(NOW WORKING AS KAZHAKAM,PARIPPU DEVASWOM, PARIPPU SUB GROUP,KOTTAYAM GROUP, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD).
BY ADV. DR.K.P.PRADEEP RESPONDENTS:
------------------------ 1.
THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEVASWOM DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2.
THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
3.
THE DEVASWOM COMMISSIONER, THE TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANTHANCODE,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003.
4.
SUBGROUP OFFICER,PARIPPU DEVASWOM, PARIPPU SUB GROUP,KOTTAYAM GROUP, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD,KOTTAYAM.
R1 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.RAJASREE M.J R2 TO R4 BY SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU, SC,TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
pk
WP(C).No.14573 of 2014 (V) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
------------------------------------ EXT.P1-TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.ROC 5223/06/EST:4 DATED 21.12.2007 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2-TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25.5.2012 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXT.P3-TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDING NO.ROC NO.1310/86/EST DATED 5.6.2012 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:
NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE pk
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
***************************************************** W.P.(C) No.14573 of 2014 ***************************************************** Dated this the 3rd day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner approached the third respondent by Ext.P2. The petitioner highlights his grievance that the petitioner is entitled for category change to the post of L.D.Clerk. The petitioner has been appointed under dying in harness scheme as a 'Kzhakom'. The petitioner submits that he has sufficient qualification to be appointed as L.D.Clerk. The petitioner submits that he has been appointed as 'Kzhakom' on the reason that there were no vacancy at the relevant point of time in the post of L.D. Clerk. The petitioner also submits that there are sufficient vacancies in the post of L.D.Clerk and she may be considered for the post of L.D.Clerk.
In view of Ext.P2, appropriate decision shall be taken on the same by the third respondent within a period of six weeks after hearing the petitioner.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln