Muraly v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MAY 2015/22ND VAISAKHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 14410 of 2015 (A) --------------------------- PETITIONER:- ---------- MURALY AGED 52 YEARS S/O.NEELAKANDAN, ELLUVILA VEEDU, AITHILA CHADAYAMANGALAM P.O., KOLLAM-591534.

BY ADVS.SRI.E.A.BIJUMON SRI.AJEESH S.BRITE RESPONDENTS:- -----------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

4. DY.S.P. OF POLICE KOLLAM.

5. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADAKKAL, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

6. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHADAYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT. BY STATE ATTORNEY SRI.P.VIJAYARAGHAVAN.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 14410 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- --------------------- EXHIBIT-P1: TRUE COPY OF THE DEED DATED 31.12.1968. EXHIBIT-P2: TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 16.04.2015. EXHIBIT-P3: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT AND RECEIPT, DATED 06.05.2015.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL.

--------------------- ( TRUE COPY ) PA TO JUDGE.

Kvs/-

C.K.ABDUL REHIM, & P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JJ.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No.14410 of 2015-A.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 12th day of May, 2015.

J U D G M E N T

P.B.SURESH KUMAR, J.

The grievance voiced by the petitioner in this writ petition is that respondents 5 and 6 police officers are compelling the petitioner to surrender a portion of his property to widen the road abutting the same. 2.

The learned State Attorney, on instructions, submitted that respondents 5 and 6 have not harassed the petitioner in any manner and that the road referred to by the petititioner has already been widened. He has also submitted that there is no complaint pending before them against the petitioner concerning the formation of the road.

3. In the light of the submission made by the learned State Attorney, there is no scope for any grievance

W.P.(C) No.14410/2015-A.

for the petitioner. The writ petition, in the circumstances is closed, recording the submission made by the learned State Attorney.

Sd/- C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.

Sd/- P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.

Kvs/- // true copy // PA TO JUDGE.