M/S.Augusta Enterprises v. Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/18TH JYAISHTA, 1937 OP.No. 38199 of 2001 (V) ------------------------ PETITIONER:

----------- M/S.AUGUSTA ENTERPRISES, PATHIRAPPALLY, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI.TITTY HARSHAN.

BY ADVS.SRI.M.A.FIROZ SRI.C.S.ULLAS SMT.K.BINU MOLE RESPONDENTS:

------------ 1.

UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISRY OF AGRICULTURE, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI.

2.

UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI.

3.

STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, REP.

BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (OPERATIONS), POOJAPURA, TRIVANDRUM.

4.

STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE, REP. BY ITS MANAGER, SAKTHIKULANGARA BRANCH, QUILON.

R,R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.S.SREEDHARAN PILLAI, SCGSC R,R3&4 BY ADV. SRI.M.PATHROSE MATTHAI (SR.) R, BY ADV. SRI.SAJI VARGHESE R,R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.JOHN VARGHESE, SCGSC THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

OP.No. 38199 of 2001 (V) ------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT.14/1/98 SUBMITTED TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA.

EXT.P2: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.P.NO.14047/97 DT.30/7/98. EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DT. 10/11/98 FROM THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE BANKING DIVISION TO THE DEEP SEA TRAWLER OWNER'S ASSOCIATION.

EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NO.GOI/9/2001.DT. 9TH MAY,2001. EXT.P5: LETTER NO. NIL DATED 2ND APRIL 2002 ISSUED BY GEORGE EADEN M.P TO MINISTER OF FINANCE EXT.P6: LETTER NO. REC/GOI /9/2001 DATED 9/5/2001 ISSSUED BY 4TH RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL ----------------------- //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE rsr

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE -------------------------------------- OP. No. 38199 of 2001 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the original petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE rsr