High Court of KeralaWP(C)/14712/2014disposed of

Thara M.S. v. The M.D., Kerala State Co-Op.Bank Ltd

2015-02-12Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/23RD MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 14712 of 2014 (L) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- THARA M.S.

MANAGING DIRECTOR M/S. THARA EXPORTING AND MARKETING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED RESIDING AT KINATTUVILAKATHU VEEDU, T.C 31/714 PETTAH P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.T.K.ANANDA KRISHNAN RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD CO-BANK TOWERS, PALAYAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033.

2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001 R1 BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM, SC, KERALA STATE CO.OP BANK LTD.

R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. T. R. RAJESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 14712 of 2014 (L) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1- TRUE COPY OF THE SCHEME AS IMPLEMENTED BY THE IST RESPONDENT AS PER CIRCULAR NO. CRM 56/2012-13 EXHIBIT-P2- TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION WITH THE ENDORSEMENT OF MINISTER EXHIBIT-P3- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30/10/2012. EXHIBIT-P4- TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- --------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-R1(a):- COPY OF THE ORDER IN COMPLAINT NO. 421/2013 DATED 23.12.2013 /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 14712 OF 2014 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Kerala Lok Ayukta has by Ext.R1(a) order found that the petitioner has been extended the benefit of the one time settlement scheme. But the petitioner asserts that the benefit of the Aswas 2012 scheme had not been extended in full. It is open to the petitioner to raise this question in an arbitration case if any filed against the first respondent in this regard. No further questions are raised.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE