← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/17833/2011dismissed as infructuous

Prasad.T v. Sheela Ravindran And Others

2015-03-11Honourable Mr. Justice Anil K.Narendran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/20TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 17833 of 2011 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :- ---------------------- PRASAD T., S/O.LATE CHELLAPPAN, PATHIKAALAYIL HOUSE, MANJAKUNNU DESOM, PEECHI VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN - 680 652.

REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SANTHAMMA, W/O.LATE CHELLAPPAN, PATHIKAALAYIL HOUSE, MANJAKUNNU DESOM, PEECHI VILLAGE, THRISSURE DISTRICT, PIN - 680 652.

BY ADV. SRI.C.A.ANOOP RESPONDENTS :- --------------------------

1. SHEELA RAVINDRAN, VARADIYATH HOUSE, MANJAKUNNU, PATTIKKADU - 680 652.

2. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, MANNUTHY - 680 651.

3. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, THRISSUR - 680 001.

R2 BY SRI.SAJEEVKUMAR K.GOPAL,SC,KSEB R3 BY SMT.M.J.RAJASHREE, SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rkj

ANIL K.NARENDRAN, J ------------------------------------------------------------ W.P.(C)No.17833 of 2011 ------------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 11th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute has already been settled between the parties and the petitioner does not want to prosecute the writ petition further. In such circumstances recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- ANIL K.NARENDRAN JUDGE rkj //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE