High Court of KeralaWP(C)/14899/2015disposed of

Emiline Mathew v. Director Of Public Instructions

2015-07-21Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JULY 2015/30TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 14899 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- EMILINE MATHEW, AGED 28 YEARS D/O.MATHEW, CHERUMKALAYIL HOUSE, THELLAKOM P.O. KOTTAYAM-686 630.

BY ADV. SRI.T.O.XAVIER RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS JAGATHY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014.

2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KOTTAYAM-686 001.

3. THE CORPORATE EDUCATION AGENCY DIOCESE OF VIJAYAPURAM, KOTTAYAM-686 014 REPRESENTED BY CORPORATE MANAGER.

4. DIOCESE OF VIJAYAPURAM REPRESENTED BY BISHOP, BISHOP HOUSE COLLECTORATE P.O., KOTTAYAM, 686 014.

R3-R4 BY ADV. SRI.V.M.KURIAN R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LOWSY.A.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 14899 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1.A TRUE COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL CERTIFICATE OBTAINED FROM THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY KOTTAYAM DATED 25TH APRIL 2008. EXT.P2.A TRUE COPY OF THE EXPERIENCE CERTIFCATE ISSUED FROM THE PRINCIPAL OF SCHOOL.

EXT.P3.A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION APPEARED IN THE DIOCESE NEWS.

EXT.P4.A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15/10/2013. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.14899 OF 2015 (J) ----------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is a person who is aspiring for a post of teacher in one of the educational institutions under the management of the 3rd respondent. Towards this end, the petitioner's father has submitted Ext.P4 representation before the 4th respondent, and the limited prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 representation, expeditiously, after hearing the petitioner.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 representation, after hearing the petitioner, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this

W.P.(C).No.14899/2015 judgment. The petitioner shall also produce a copy of the writ petition along with the copy of this judgment before the 4th respondent, for further action.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp