Aneesh v. The City Police Commissioner
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE MONDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/18TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 15151 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- ANEESH A.A., AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.ABU, SABEENA ESTATE, FLAT NO.D, KRISHNA LANE, SRM ROAD, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM- 682 017.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.J.SANTHOSH, SRI.GEORGE JOSEPH PULIMOOTTIL.
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER, KOCHI CITY, ERNAKULAM-682 030.
2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MATTANCHERY- 682 002.
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MATTANCHERY POLICE STATION, PIN- 682 002.
4. A.M. ABU, S/O. MAMU, KARIGANTHURUTHIL (H), MARTHANDAPARAMBU LANE, CHEMBAR JN., MATTANCHERY- 682 002.
5. AYSHA BEEVI, W/O.A.M. ABU, KARIGANTHURUTHIL (H), MARTHANDAPARAMBU LANE, CHEMBAR JN., MATTANCHERY- 682 002.
R1 TO R3 BY SRI.P. VIJAYARAGHAVAN, STATE ATTORNEY. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
WP(C).No. 15151 of 2015 (T) APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS:
NIL.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs.
ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.C.No.15151 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of June 2015
J U D G M E N T
Ashok Bhushan, CJ Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging police harassment. Petitioner's case is that at the instance of respondents 4 and 5, who are none else than father and mother of the petitioner, the 3rd respondent has called the petitioner.
3.
The learned State Attorney, has filed a statement in which it has been stated that the petitioner had received an amount of Rs.1,15,000/- from respondents 4 and 5 on the promise that the said amount shall be returned as and when demanded and till then he would pay Rs.2,000/- per month towards the rent of the house in which respondents 4 and 5 have been staying. When the promised rent was not paid,
respondents 4 and 5 demanded return of the amount and thereafter Petition No.147/2015 was registered at the police station. Petitioner was called at the police station on 14/05/2015. Police found the allegations made by respondents 4 and 5 to be true and directed the petitioner to settle the disputes. It is stated that, after closing the petition on 14/05/2015, petitioner was never summoned. On a perusal of the statement filed by the State Attorney, we do not find any case of police harassment in this writ petition. Hence this petition is dismissed. (sd/-) (ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE) (sd/-) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) jsr