High Court of KeralaWP(C)/15218/2015disposed of

B.Retnakumar Unnithan v. State Of Kerala

2015-05-25Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2015/4TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 15218 of 2015 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ B.RETNAKUMAR UNNITHAN, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.N.BHASKARAN UNNITHAN, KRISHNA KRIPA, PARKKAD, IRAKKUZHY P.O., KADAKKAL, KOLLAM - 691 559. (EMPANELLED DRIVER, K.S.R.T.C PUNALUR DEPOT.) BY ADV. SRI.R.PUSHPANGATHAN PILLAI RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. THOMAS JOHN AMBOOKEN BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 15218 of 2015 (B) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE DUTY PASS ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER IN G.O.(MS) NO.78/2011/TRAN DATED 22/12/2011.

EXHIBIT P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE COVER PAGE, PAGES 12 AND 13 CONTAINING CLAUSE XLIX OF THE BILATERIAL AGREEMENT DATED 22/5/2012. EXHIBIT P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 15/03/2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT WITH COPY TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 7/4/2015 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.11132/2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 15218 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 25th day of May, 2015

JUDGMENT

Ext.P3 bilateral agreement obliges the second respondent to take up the issue of regularisation of the services of the petitioners with the first respondent. The petitioners lament that the second respondent has not raised its little finger till date. This has prompted the petitioner to submit Ext.P4 representation with the first respondent and the same is pending. 2.

I direct the first respondent to consider Ext.P4 representation with notice to the petitioners and the second respondent. The needful shall be done within a period of three months with due advertance to the relevant clauses in Ext.3 bilateral agreement.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd