High Court of KeralaWP(C)/15319/2015disposed of

G. Padmakumar v. The Intelligence Inspector

2015-05-253 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2015/4TH JYAISHTA, 19372 WP(C).No. 15319 of 2015 (L) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- G. PADMAKUMAR , PROPRIETOR, P & P FURNITURE MART, THAZHAVA, KUTHIRAPANTHI-P.O. KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.V.DEVANANDA NARASIMHAM RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE INTELLIGENCE INSPECTOR, COMMERCIAL TAXES, SQUAD NO.VII, THEVARA ERNAKULAM-682 015.

2. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, KARUNAGAPPALLY- 688 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.SHOBHA ANNAMMA EAPPEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

MSD.

WP(C).No. 15319 of 2015 (L) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

TRUE COPY OF DEPARTMENTAL DELIVERY NOTE DATED 19.04.2015 ISSUED BY PETITIONER TO TRANSPORT TEAK WOOD FROM KUTHIRAPANTHI TO CHOVOOR.

EXT.P2:

TRUE COPY OF ONLINE DELIVERY NOTICE (FORM 15) DATED 23.05.2015 GENERATED BY THE PETITIONER TO TRANSPORT PROCESSED GOODS FROM THRISSUR TO KARUNAGAPALLY. EXT.P3:

TRUE COPY OF DETENTION NOTICE DATED 23.05.2015 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------------ NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE MSD.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No.15319 of 2015 ----------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of May, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has approached this Court challenging the detention of his vehicle with goods as per Ext.P3 notice. As per Ext.P3 notice, the petitioner has been directed to furnish security deposit of 34,720/-.

₹

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court finds that there is no need for detaining the vehicle. The same shall, therefore, be released to the petitioner on execution of a simple bond without sureties.

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.