High Court of KeralaWP(C)/15355/2015disposed of

Y.Geevarghese v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

2015-05-26Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MAY 2015/5TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 15355 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ Y.GEEVARGHESE, THENGUVILA VEEDU, MYLAMKULAM, PUTHOOR P.O., KOTTARAKARA PIN-691 507 (SUPDT. CHADAYAMANGALAM UNIT).

BY ADV. SRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP. BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023.

2. THE CONVENER, DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE, OFFICE OF THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695023.

BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 15355 of 2015 (T) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 - COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE CIRCULAR DATED 26-3-2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P2 - COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 31-3-2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3 - COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 8-5-2015 OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (VIGILANCE) EXHIBIT P4 - COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 20-3-2009 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1646/2008 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.

EXHIBIT P5 - COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 12-5-2015 OF THE PETITIONER SENT TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 15355 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 26th day of May, 2015

JUDGMENT

The disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner has already culminated. The petitioner therefore seeks promotion to the post of Administrative Officer. The petitioner points out that he has been awarded a punishment of temporary payment of increment without cumulative effect. The case of the petitioner that such punishment will not be an impediment for its future promotion. Reliance is placed on Ext.P4 judgment in WP (C) No. 1646/2008 for this purpose. The petitioner has preferred Ext.P4 representation with the second respondent in this regard. 2.

I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P5 representation at the time of the convening of the next meeting. The needful shall be done and appropriate follow up action taken by the first respondent.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd