P.B Chandran v. Kerala Water Authority

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/7TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 15622 of 2014 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- P.B CHANDRAN ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (RETD) KERALA WATERAUTHORITY, RESIDING AT KRISHNA NIVAS THAMARAKKULAMKOLLAM - 691001.

BY ADVS.SRI.N.SUKUMARAN (SR.) SRI.S.SHYAM SRI.N.K.KARNIS SRI.KURUVILLA JOHN RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. KERALA WATER AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, JALA BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695033.

2. MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695033.

3. FINANCE MANAGER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695033.

R BY SRI.GEORGE MATHEW, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 29-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 15622 of 2014 (C) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P-1:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 14.9.1993.

EXT.P-2:

TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO OF CHARGES ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 14.10.1993 EXT.P-3:

TRUE COPY OF THE EXPLANATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO EXT.P2 DATED 15.11.1993 EXT.P-4:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND TO THE PETITIONER REVOKING EXT.P1 ORDER DT.22.12.1993 EXT.P-5:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 31.12.1993 EXT.P-6:

TRUE COPY OF THE FIRST INFORMATION REPORT IN CRIME NO.11 OF 1996 OF THE VIGILANCE AND ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU DATED 9.8.1996 EXT.P-7:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 22.1.1997 EXT.P-8:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 17.3.2003 EXT.P-9:

TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN EXT.P6 CASE 7.11.2007 EXT.P-10:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DT.5.2.2013. EXT.P-11:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 10.12.2013 EXT.P-12:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 7.2.2014 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL --------------------------------------- // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.15622 of 2014 - C ====================== Dated this the 29th day of September, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P12 representation filed before the 2nd respondent. The revisions are filed on 07.02.2014.

2. In such circumstance, the 2nd respondent definitely will have to look at the representation filed before it and consider the same in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing, at any rate within a period of three months from the date of hearing. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on merits, which the 2nd respondent will consider, in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB The original order dated 06/11/2015 in I.A 15374/2015 in W.P.(C) No.15622/2014 is appended along with the judgment dated 29/09/2015 in W.P.(C) No.15622/2014 Sd/- Registrar (Judicial)