High Court of KeralaWP(C)/15598/2015disposed of

N.Nikhil v. The State Of Kerala

2015-05-27Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2015/6TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 15598 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------- N.NIKHIL, AGED 24 YEARS S/O. LATE V.NARAYANAN, MANANGODE HOUSE, P.O.NEMMARA PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SMT.P.A.JENZIA RESPONDENT(S):

--------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 033.

3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION THRISSUR AT AYYANTHOLE-680 003.

4. THE MANAGER NSS COLLEGE, NEMMARA, CENTRAL COMMITTEE NSS HEAD QUARTERS CHANGANASSERY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT-686 101.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.J.RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 15598 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ P1 : COPY OF THE DEATH CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER'S FATHER DTD.22.9.2012.

P2 : COPY OF THE SERVICE CERTIFICATE OF THE PETITIONER'S FATHER DTD.27.10.2014.

P3 : COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT DTD.27.10.2014.

P4 : COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.447 OF 2015-E DTD.7.1.2015. P5 : COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE MANAGER DTD.13.2.2015. P6 : COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE GOVERNMENT DTD.30.3.2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:NIL ----------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

............................................................. W.P.(C).No.15598 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 27th day of May, 2015 J U D G M E N T The petitioner who had claimed appointment under the 4th respondent College in accordance with the dying-in-harness scheme that was introduced in aided Colleges, is aggrieved by the rejection of his claim by the 4th respondent. Aggrieved by the decision of the 4th respondent, he has preferred an appeal before the 1st respondent and the limited prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on the same expeditiously.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 appeal within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns