← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/15609/2015disposed of

Asuma Beevi v. The District Geologist

2015-05-27Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2015/6TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 15609 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- ASUMA BEEVI, AGED 40 YEARS, D/O. NABEESA, ASHIK MANZIL, ADIKKATTUKULANGARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690 501.

BY ADVS.SRI.M.G.SREEJITH SRI.ASHOK SURESH RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE DISTRICT GEOLOGIST, GEOLOGIST, OFFICE OF THE MINING AND GEOLOGY, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690 534.

2. THE DIRECTOR, MINING AND GEOLOGY, OFFICE OF THE MINING AND GEOLOGY, KESAVADASAPURAM, PATTAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 15609 of 2015 (A) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :

COPY OF THE BUILDING PERMIT DTD. 11.5.2015 ISSUED BY THE PALAMEL GRAMA PANCHAYATH.

P2 :

COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD. 20.5.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ------------------------------------------ /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 15609 of 2015 (A) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of May, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The case of the petitioner is that, on the strength of Ext.P1 building permit, the petitioner levelled the property by removing ordinary earth for construction of a residential building. But when the petitioner approached the 1st respondent/Geologist with a request for issuance of Mineral Transit pass to transport the earth from his property, it was refused to be acted upon.

2.

Heard the learned Government Pleader as well. 3.

By virtue of Rule 14 of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 the persons doing construction of residential building including flats or commercial buildings having a plinth area upto 300 square metres are exempted from obtaining quarrying permit under the Rules, if the owner of the land has obtained a prior valid permit for construction of such building from the concerned Local Self

-2Government authority. The said Rule reads as follows: "14. Quarrying permit for Ordinary earth:

(1) A quarrying permit under these rules shall be obtained for extraction of ordinary earth used for filling or levelling purposes in construction of embankments, roads, railways or buildings in Form N:

(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (1), no quarrying permit is required under these rules for extraction of ordinary earth in connection with the construction of residential buildings including flats or commercial buildings having a plinth area of 300 square metres if the owner of the land obtained a prior valid permit for construction of such building from the Local Self Government authorities concerned;

Provided that in cases where transportation of ordinary earth is required, the owner shall pay royalty for the quantity to be transported and shall obtain mineral transit passes under the

-3Kerala State Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Storage and Transportation) Rules, 2015 from the competent authority;

Provided further that the competent authority shall not issue mineral transit passes for removal of ordinary earth exceeding the quantity needed to be extracted as ascertained by it through a site inspection."

4.

In the above facts and circumstances. The 1st respondent/District Geologist is directed to issue 'Mineral Transit Pass' in Form O(A) of the Kerala Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Storage and Transportation) Rules, 2015 (for brevity "Prevention Act"], on being satisfied with the genuineness of the claim of the petitioner based on Exhibit P1 building permit, without insisting for 'NOC'/Mining permit; in accordance with law, which shall be done at the earliest at any rate within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The

-4petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 1st respondent/District Geologist for further steps.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj