High Court of KeralaWP(C)/15632/2015disposed of

M/S.Sky Ply v. Kerala State Pollution Control Board

2015-06-09Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/19TH JYAISHTA, 1937 W.P.(C).No.15632 of 2015 (D) -------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):- ------------------------ M/S.SKY PLY, REPRESENTED BY ITS MAANGING PARTNER-BAIJU T.ALIAS, KOZHOOR IRAPURAM-683541.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.THOMAS GEEVERGHESE SRI.TONY THOMAS (INCHIPARAMBIL).

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004.

2. ENVIORNMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE (ERNAKULAM-II), 1ST FLOOR, MANNA RESIDENCY, M.C ROAD, PERUMBAVOOR - 683 542. R1 & R2 BY STANDING COUNSEL SRI. M.AJAY.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No.15632 of 2015 (D) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:- --------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF CONSENT TO EXTABLISH NO.PCB/EKM/DO2/IC-R1/17/2013 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P2 PHTOOGRAPHS OF THE INDUSTRY OF THE PETITIONER, TAKEN ON 23RD MAY 2015.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DATED 8TH JANUARY 2015 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF REPLY SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO EXT.P3, DATED 19TH JANUARY 2015.

EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF CLOSURE NOTICE DATED 10TH APRIL 2015, ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 4TH MAY 2015 FILED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD.

EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF BANK STATEMENT OF THE PETITIONER ISSUED BY FEDERAL BANK, KEEZHILAM BRANCH, DATED 23/5/2015. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- ----------------------------------------- NIL.

Vku/- [ true copy ]

K. Vinod Chandran, J ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.15632 of 2015-D ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 09th day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved with the fact that the application for consent to operate, filed by the petitioner has not been considered by the respondents.

2. The learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2, on instruction, submits that, if an application is filed properly before the respondents, then the same shall be considered within two months.

Recording the submission, the writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran Judge.

vku/- [ true copy ]