High Court of KeralaWP(C)/15661/2015disposed of

Jude Sajith D'Cruz v. The Chief Information Officer [Central]

2015-05-27Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2015/6TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 15661 of 2015 (G) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

------------------------ JUDE SAJITH D'CRUZ, REGINTON BIDGS, AIRPORT ROAD, VALLAKADAVU P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADVS.SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY SRI.A.S.ANILKUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER [CENTRAL], CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, ROOM NO.326, 2ND FLOOR, AUGUST KRANTI BHAWAN, BHIKAJI CAME PLACE, NEW DELHI- 110 066

2. THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY PIO/APIO, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, TRIVANDRUM DIVISION, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 014

3. THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, PERSONAL BRANCH, TRIVANDRUM DIVISION, THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 014 R1 & R3 BY SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL SRI.M.C.MONY, CGC R2 SRI.C.S.DIAS,SC, RAILWAYS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 15661 of 2015 (G) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 4/12/2014 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 10/12/2014 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSION DATED 20/12/2014 EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 31/1/2015 EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE SECOND APPEAL DATED 19/2/2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ------------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 15661 of 2015 (G) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of May, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance seems to be that Ext.P4 filed on 31.01.2015 has not been considered till date by the 2nd respondent.

If no other appeal, filed prior to that, is pending before the 2nd respondent and if the same is properly instituted, the same shall be taken up expeditiously and considered. Such consideration of appeal shall be in accordance with the pendency of similar matters before the Officer concerned.

The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above observation.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj