High Court of KeralaWP(C)/15806/2015disposed of

Vidhya.V v. Union Of India

2015-05-28Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2015/7TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 15806 of 2015 (A) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- VIDHYA.V, AGED 34 YEARS D/O.M.B.VIJAYARAGHAVAN NAIR, MULLEPPILLIL HOUSE, PALLIPARAMBUKVU ROAD, VYRELIL NAGAR, TRIPUNITHURA, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM.

BY ADV. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. UNION OF INDIA REP. BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI 110 001.

2.FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE, CHENNAI - 6, REP. BY ITS ZONAL MANAER.

3.THE REGIONAL MANAGER, FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, REGIONAL OFFICE, TRIVANDRUM, KESAVADASAPURAM, TRIVANDRUM695 004.

4.AREA MANAGER, FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, DISTRICT OFFICE, KANDAMKULATHY TOWERS, M.G.ROAD, KOCHI - 11.

R BY SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL R BY SRI.JOSE KURIAKOSE, SC, FCI R BY SRI.THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

W.P.(C).NO.15806/2015.

APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1: COPY OF ORDER DATED 13.12.2005.

EXT.P2: COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 10.08.2010. EXT.P3: COPY OF THE DECISION DATED 7.1.2014 IN HRMP NO.285/2014. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 12.2.2014. EXT.P5: COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 6.4.2015. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.15806 OF 2015 (A) ----------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of May, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, whose father was working as a category IV employee under the 2nd respondent, has approached respondents 2 to 4 with Ext.P5 representation seeking compassionate appointment to a suitable post under the services of the said respondents. In the writ petition, the limited prayer of the petitioner is for a direction to respondents 2 to 4 to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 representation preferred by the petitioner expeditiously, after hearing the petitioner.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.Jose Kuriakose, the learned Standing counsel for respondents 2 to 4 as also Sri.N.Nagaresh, the learned Assistant Solicitor General of India takes notice for the 1st respondent.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition

W.P.(C).No.15806/2015 with a direction to respondents 2 to 4 to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 representation preferred by the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after hearing the petitioner.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp