High Court of KeralaWP(C)/19692/2012disposed of

Sukumaran v. Land Tribunal Kottayam

2015-01-08Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/18TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 19692 of 2012 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- SUKUMARAN, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O. RAMANKUTTY, NEEROZHUKUMCHALIL, KOTHANALLOOR VILLAGE, VAIKOM.

BY ADVS.SRI.V.T.MADHAVANUNNI, SRI.V.A.SATHEESH, SRI.J.ABHILASH.

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. LAND TRIBUNAL, KOTTAYAM- 686 001.

2. VALSALAKUMARI, D/O.VELAYUDHAN PILLAI, KARTHIKA HOUSE, ETTUMANOOR EAST, KOTTAYAM TALUK, PIN- 686 631. R1 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.SUNITHA VINOD.

R2 BY ADVS. SRI.ABRAHAM P.GEORGE, SRI.K.VINODKUMAR.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WP(C).No. 19692 of 2012 (J) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT.P1 COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER DATED 15/06/1999.

EXT.P2 COPY OF THE DECREE DATED 28/05/1993.

EXT.P3 COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 14/11/2011 BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT.P4 COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 09/01/2012 BY 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs.

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 19692 of 2012 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of January, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, who is a member of Scheduled Caste, has approached this Court alleging that his father had obtained 10 cents of land as per Ext.P2 decree. He applied for patta before the 1st respondent as per Ext.P1, which was numbered as OA No.131/99. However, the 2nd respondent filed shifting application in the said OA; and the petitioner filed Ext.P3 application to withdraw his case, before the 1st respondent on 14.11.2011. His grievance is that the 1st respondent has not considered Ext.P3 till date and no orders have been passed thereon.

As the limited prayer in this writ petition is for a consideration of Ext.P3 by the 1st respondent, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 application within a period of one month from today if Ext.P3 has not been disposed of till date.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JUDGE bka/-