High Court of KeralaWP(C)/15995/2015disposed of

Vivek Anand v. The Regional Transport Officer

2015-06-05Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/15TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 15995 of 2015 (Y) -------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :

------------------------- VIVEK ANAND, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.MOORTHY, 1134, PERIYAR NAGAR BLOCK, D.J.HALLI, BANGALORE -560 045 BY ADVS.SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN SRI.SAIJO HASSAN SRI.BENOJ C AUGUSTIN SRI.R.S.SARAT SRI.VIVEK V. KANNANKERI SRI.VISHNU BHUVANENDRAN RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM - 682 030.

2. THE ADDL. REGISTERING AUTHORITY, (THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER), MUDAVOOR P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA - 686 669.

3. ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, D.J. HALLI, BANGALORE - 560 045.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd

WP(C).No. 15995 of 2015 (Y) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 11.02.2015 ISSUED FROM THE D.J.HALLI POLICE STATION ALONG WITH ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION.

P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 23.04.2015 OF PETITIONER FOR DUPLICATE RC BOOK AND DUPLICATE NOC BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 10.03.2015 ISSUED BY THE SENIOR REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, BANGALORE.

P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 24.04.2015 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE Msd

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P(C) No.15995 of 2015 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 5th day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

Aggrieved by the rejection of Ext.P2 application for duplicate registration certificate by the second respondent, the petitioner has come up before this Court.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

3. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submitted that the rejection of Ext.P2 application was on account of the non production of police report which is mandatory for the issuance of duplicate certificate.

Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to submit the police report in support of his claim before the respondent at the earliest and the in the event of producing such certificate, the duplicate registration certificate shall be issued by the respondents within a period of two weeks thereafter. Sd/- A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE krj