C.K. Gopi v. The District Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/26TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20057 of 2012 (F) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- C.K. GOPI, AGED 58 YEARS S/O.KUMARAN, SIVAS HOUSE, KIZHAKKUMBHAGAM KARA, ETTUMANOOR VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.M.V.THAMBAN SRI.R.REJI SMT.THARA THAMBAN SRI.B.BIPIN RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KOTTAYAM PIN 686001
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KOTTAYAM, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN 686001
3. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695001
4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE KOTTAYAM DIVISION COLLECTORATE (PO) KOTTAYAM PIN 686001
5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE EXCISE RANGE ETTUMANOOR KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN 686631
6. THE EXCISE INSPECTOR EXCISE RANGE ETTUMANOOR KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN 686631
7. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ETTUMANOOR POLICE STATION ETTUMANOOR PO KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN 686 631 -2-
-2WP(C).No. 20057 of 2012 (F) ---------------------------------------
8. P.C BOSE S/O. CHELLAPPAN, RESIDING AT PAYALKARIYIL VEETIL, ATHIRUMPUZHA VILLAGE, ETTUMANOOR PO KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN 686631
9. ROY K.THOMAS S/O.THOMAS, RESIDING AT KANJIRATHINGAL VEEDU, ETTUMANOOR VILLAGE ETTUMANOOR PO, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN 686631
10. BHARATHI SREEDHARAN W/O.SREEDHARAN, NADAPURAYIL VEETIL KADAPPOOR KARAYIL, MEENACHAL TALUK, ETTUMANOOR PO, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN 686631
11. GEORGE VARGHESE S/O. GEORGE THOMAS, ILLATHUPARAMBIL VEETIL, AYARKUNNAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM TALUK AYARKUNNAM PO, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT PIN 686564 R1-7 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.G.GOPAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: VS
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
----------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.20057 of 2012 ----------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of November, 2015
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the matter in this writ petition has become infructuous.
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE vs /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE