K.O.George v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST 2015/12TH SRAVANA, 1937 W.P.(C).No.23477 of 2007 (T) ----------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):- -------------------------- K.O. GEORGE, PROPRIETOR, M/S. G.K. INDUSTRIES, ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, SREEMOOLANAGARAM-683580 ALUVA.
BY ADVS.SRI.SHAIJAN C.GEORGE SRI.JOHN VIPIN SMT.S.A.SHERLY SMT.SAJITHA GEORGE.
RESPONDENT(S):- ----------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO SC/ST DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.
2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT.
3. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, SC/ST DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, KAKKANADU.
4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION, ERNAKULAM.
5. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTOR'S OFFICE, SC/ST DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, TRIVANDRUM.
6. ASST. ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL LI SECTION, ALUVA.
R1 TO R5 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MANOJ P.KUNJACHAN R6 BY STANDING COUNSEL SMT.P.K.RADHIKA R6 BY ADV. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
W.P.(C).NO.23477 OF 2007-T APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------ EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF TENDER SCHEDULE.
EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF ACCEPTED TENDER SCHEDULE.
EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF BILL PASSED.
EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE NON-LIABILITY CERTIFICATE BY ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICLA WING LI SECTION, ALUVA. EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE SAID LETTER DATED 24.11.2005. EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25.6.2007. EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF A SIMILAR JUDGMENT DATED 22.1.2007. RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------------- EXT.R4(a) TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 13.08.2009.
VKU/- [ true copy ]
K. Vinod Chandran, J ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.23477 of 2007-T ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 03rd day of August, 2015
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition was filed in the year 2007, contending that certain amounts with respect to a work executed by the petitioner, a P.W.D. Electrical contractor, has not been received by him. The specific amount claimed in the bill at Exhibit P3 was Rs.1,04,269/-.
2. The Government has now produced Exhibit R4(a), the letter issued by the petitioner herein, contending that the entire amount has been received.
3. In the above circumstances, nothing survives in the writ petition and the same is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran Judge.
vku/- [ true copy ]