High Court of KeralaWP(C)/16531/2015disposed of

A.Purushan v. The Managing Director, Kerala Water Authority

2015-06-08Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR MONDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/18TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 16531 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------- A.PURUSHAN AGED 54 YEARS S/O.AYYAPPAN, KWA QUARTERS, KOOVAPPADAM KOCHI -682 002 (EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (P & M)-1) KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALABHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 033.

BY ADV. SRI.K.P.JUSTINE (KARIPAT) RESPONDENT(S):

---------------

1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY JALA BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033.

2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER HRD (GENERAL) KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 033.

BY SRI.GEORGE MATHEW, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 16531 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------- EXT.P-1: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.KWA/HO/E-2(A)/5130/2012 DATED 21.7.2012 EXT.P-2: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.KWA/JB/E.2(A)/10700/2012 DATED 12.9.2013 EXT.P-3: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.KWA/JB/E.2(A)/10700/2012 DATED 24.12.2013 EXT.P-4: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.KWA/JB/E.2(A)/10700/2012 DATED 4.12.2014 EXT.P-5: TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTRATION DATED 21.5.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:NIL ------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

............................................................. W.P.(C).No.16531 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 8th day of June, 2015 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is an Executive Engineer of the Kerala Water Authority presently working at Thiruvananthapuram. It is his case that on account of a medical condition, he has to visit a hospital in Ernakulam in connection with periodical medical check ups, and therefore, he has preferred a representation before the 1st respondent seeking a transfer to Ernakulam. The limited prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition is for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 representation preferred by the petitioner before him.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I dispose the writ petition with direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 representation preferred by the petitioner, requesting for a transfer to the next arising vacancy in Ernakulam, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment, after hearing the petitioner. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns