High Court of KeralaWP(C)/16594/2015disposed of

N.Sasikumar v. The State Of Kerala

2015-06-25Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/4TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 16594 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

------------- N. SASIKUMAR, P.W.D. CONTRACTOR, KRISHNAKRIPA, PAYAKUTTY P.O., NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 22.

BY ADV. SRI.AJITH KRISHNAN.

RESPONDENT(S):

-------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 001.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 033.

3. STATE ENGINEER, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAK - 695 033.

4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, ALAPPUZHA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT - 688 001.

5. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, WORLD MARKET, ANAYARA P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 029.

6. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, WORLD MARKET, ANAYARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 029.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJU MEENATTOOR.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rvs.

WP(C).No. 16594 of 2015 (Y) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

---------------------- EXHIBIT-P1TRUE COPY OF THE SELETION NOTICE AND AGREEMENT SCHEDULE NO. 06/2012-13 DATED 09/10/2012 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT-P2TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 10/04/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

---------------------- NIL.

/TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE RVS.

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.16594 of 2015 - Y ====================== Dated this the 25th day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner was awarded a work by the Agricultural Department, which though commenced, could not be completed for reason of certain objections raised by the Forest Department. In fact the Forest Department had registered a case against the petitioner and the officials of the Agricultural Department. The work however proceeded up to mid-way.

2. The petitioner submits that he may be atleast paid the amounts for the work which had been completed. The petitioner had filed a representation before the authority as is evident at Ext.P2. The Principal Secretary, Agriculture shall consider the same after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing within a period of three months from the date of

W.P.(C) No.16594 of 2015 - Y receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce the certified copy of the judgment before the 1st respondent.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge.