Nagaraj v. The Sub Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE MONDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/25TH KARTHIKA, 1937 PETITIONER(S) :- -----------------
1. NAGARAJ, AGED 39 YEARS S/O. BHADRAN, RESIDING AT PULIYAPATHI, KOTTATHARA.P.O. SHOLAYOOR VILLAGE, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
2. SELVI, AGED 29 YEARS W/O. RAVI, RESIDING AT PULIYAPATHI, KODANTHARA.P.O. SHOLAYOOR VILLAGE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.R.VINOD RESPONDENT(S) :- ----------------
1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE SHOLAYOOR POLICE STATION, SHOLAYOOR.
2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AGALI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
3. AYYASWAMI, AGED 45 YEARS S/O. KARUPPUSWAMI, RESIDING AT PULIYAPATHI KOTTATHARA.P.O., SHOLAYOOR VILLAGE, MANNARKKAD PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
4. CHINNA PAPA, AGED 40 YEARS S/O. KARUPPUSWAMI, RESIDING AT PULIYAPATHI KOTTATHARA.P.O., SHOLAYOOR VILLAGE, MANNARKKAD PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
5. SELLATHA, AGED 70 YEARS W/O. KARUPPUSWAMI, RESIDING AT PULIYAPATHI KOTTATHARA.P.O., SHOLAYOOR VILLAGE, MANNARKKAD PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
6. AYYAMMA, AGED 40 YEARS W/O. AYYASWAMY, RESIDING AT PULIYAPATHI KOTTATHARA.P.O., SHOLAYOOR VILLAGE, MANNARKKAD PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
7. LAKSHMI, AGED 35 YEARS W/O. AYYASWAMY, RESIDING AT PULIYAPATHI KOTTATHARA.P.O., SHOLAYOOR VILLAGE, MANNARKKAD PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
R3, R4 & R7 BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH NAMBIAR R1 & R2 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
jvt
APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :- EXT.P1. THE TRUE COPY OF THE KRAYA CERTIFICATE NO. 266 OF 1972 DATED 30-12-1972.
EXT.P2. THE TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :- NIL ------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.19295 of 2013 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of November 2015
J U D G M E N T
Shaffique, J.
The petitioners have approached this Court seeking for police protection.
2.
It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that during the pendency of the writ petition, no untoward incident has been reported.
3.
Learned counsel for the private respondents submits that civil dispute is pending between the parties. 4.
Since the issue between the parties relates to civil in nature, we do not think it necessary to issue any direction as sought for in the writ petition.
Hence, we close the writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to approach the civil court for appropriate relief. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE J UDGE Jvt/16.11.2015.