Lamboachan Mathew v. The Sub Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/14TH JYAISHTA, 1937 ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
--------------- LAMBOACHAN MATHEW, AGED 55 YEARS S/O. LATE P.C. MATHEW, PANNIVELIL HOUSE, KADUTHURUTHY KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN SRI.NIREESH MATHEW SRI.C.C.THOMAS (SR.) RESPONDENTS :
-------------------
1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADUTHURUTHY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 696 604.
2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KADUTHURUTHY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 604.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT 686 585.
4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOTTAYAM - 686 601.
5. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (LAW & ORDER) POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
6. STATE O FKERALA, RPRESENTED BY SECRETARY (HOME AFFAIRS) GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
7. SATHEESAN M.T.
S/O. THANKAPPAN, JAYA BHAVANAM KANJIRATHANAM P.O. PALLIKATHODU, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT - 686 001.
--------------------------------
8. SALMON M.J.
S/O. JOSEPH MATTAMMEL HOUSE, CHANTHIROOR P.O. AROOR VIA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT - 688 534.
R1 TO R6 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.C.R. SYAM KUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
----------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1-TRUE COPY OF THE FL-11 RENEWAL CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, KOTTAYAM.
EXHIBIT-P2-TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 06/05/2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT WITH COPIES TO RESPONDENTS 1, 3 AND 4. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :
------------------------------- NIL /TRUE COPY/ PA TO JUDGE
ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J ---------------------------------------------- W.P(C).No. 16657 of 2015 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th June, 2015
JUDGMENT
Ashok Bhushan, CJ.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. No notice is being issued to respondents 7 and 8, in view of the order, which is being passed.
2. The petitioner, who is running a hotel, has come up in the Writ Petition seeking direction to respondents 1 to 6 to give adequate protection as requested in Exhibit P3. The petitioner's case is that respondents 6 and 7, who were earlier employees of the petitioner, were terminated and they have threatened the petitioner with regard to which Exhibit P2 complaint was filed on 6.5.2015.
3. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that after receiving the complaint, both the
WP(C).16657/15 parties were called and the parties have settled the matter and no further complaint has been received. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that even thereafter there are instances of threat and trespass.
4. Be that as it may, in the event any offence is committed or there is attempt to commit offence against the petitioner, it shall be open for the petitioner to file complaint before the Police authorities concerned. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is closed.
ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE JUDGE vgs4/6/15