High Court of KeralaWP(C)/16953/2015disposed of

Anjali Menon v. Mahatma Gandhi Universityh

2015-06-16Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/26TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 16953 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

------------ ANJALI MENON AGED 24 YEARS D/O.MURALEEDHARAN T.P., PALAPPURAM OTTAPPALAM - 679 103.

BY ADV. SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH RESPONDENTS:

------------

1. MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY VICE CHANCELLOR MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM - 686 560.

2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, KOTTAYAM - 686 560. R BY SRI.VARUGHESE M.EASO, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 16953 of 2015 (T) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS ----------------------- P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE MARK LIST OF THE PETITIONER FOR THE FIRST SEMESTER EXAMINATION FEBRUARY 2014 FOR THE PAPER FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES DATED NIL.

P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR REVALUING HER ANSWER SCRIPT DATED 8/2/2015 P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR SCRUTINY OF ANSWER SCRIPTS DATED 8/2/2015 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL ------------------------ true copy css/ P.S.TO JUDGE

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J --------------------------------------------- WPC No.16953 of 2015 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

Aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in revaluating the answer papers of the petitioner, the petitioner has come up before this Court.

2. According to the petitioner, she applied for scrutiny and revaluation of "Financial Management Principles" paper for her M.Com course. Scrutiny has already been done and she had understood that five of her answers were not properly valued. She has obtained employment for which she has to produce M.Com Certificate before 31.6.2015. According to the petitioner, if the revaluation is not done immediately, the petitioner would lose her employment. It is with this background, the petitioner has come up before this Court. The learned counsel for the respondent University submits that the scrutiny is over and the process of

WPC No.16953/2015 2 revaluation is going on.

In view of the above, this Court is of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of. Hence, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent University to complete the revaluation and announce the result at the earliest, if possible, on or before 30.6.2015.

sd/- A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE css/ true copy P.S.TO JUDGE