← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/16986/2015disposed of

P.P.Varghese v. The Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

2015-06-24Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/3RD ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 16986 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ P.P.VARGHESE, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O.P.P.PAULOSE, INSPECTOR, KSRTC, KUTHATTUKULAM DEPOT, R/AT PEZHAMATTATHIL HOUSE, MELUKAVU, MATTOM P.O., MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM -695 023.

2. THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023.

3. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (VIGILANCE), MANAGER ACCOUNTS IN-CHARGE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (VIGILANCE) KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695 023.

4. THE CONVENOR, DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 023.

BY ADV. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 16986 of 2015 (W) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXT.P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE MEMO OF CHARGES ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 30.3.2015 EXT.P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT EXT.P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 20.4.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 16986 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 24th day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has filed Ext.P2 objection to Ext.P1 memo of charges. The petitioner does not require any opportunity either to adduce oral evidence or to oral documents. 2.

I direct the third respondent to consider Ext.P2 objection filed to Ext.P1 memo of charges expeditiously. Every endeavour shall be made to take the proceedings to a logical end within one month.

3.

The respondents shall pass consequential orders as regards the promotion of the petitioner to the post of Assistant Transport Officer dependent on the orders passed by the third respondent within a period of two weeks therefrom. The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd