High Court of KeralaWP(C)/17074/2015closed

K.Sulaiman v. The Director General Of Police

2015-06-09Honourable Mr.Justice A.M.Shaffique,Honourable The Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/19TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 17074 of 2015 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- K.SULAIMAN AGED 52 YEARS S/O.KASIMPILLA, AMINA MANZIL, MASJID NAGAR CHEKKAKONAM, KARAKULAM, AZHICODE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED RESPONDENTS:-:

----------------------------

1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE KERALA, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695 010.

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ARUVIKKARA POLICE STATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695 564.

3. ANSARI, AGED 37 YEARS S/O.SIDDIQUE, HASEENA MANZIL, CHEKKAKONAM KARAKULAM, AZHICODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695 564.

4. ANWAR, AGED 35 YEARS S/O.SIDDIQUE, HASEENA MANZIL, CHEKKAKONAM KARAKULAM, AZHICODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN - 695 564.

5. MUHAMMED ALI, AGED 34 YEARS S/O.ABDUL RASHEED, ALAMUKKIL VEEDU, CHELAKKONAM P.O. KARAKULAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 564. BY STATE ATTORNEY SRI.P.VIJAYARAGHAVAN.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 17074 of 2015 (H) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1. PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 07.05.2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT ALONG WITH ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS NIL --------------------------------------- Rp //TRUE COPY// PS TO JUDGE

ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

================ W.P (C) No.17074 of 2015 ================ Dated this, the 9th day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Ashok Bhushan, CJ Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned State Attorney.

Petitioner has come up in this writ petition seeking police protection. Allegations have been made against respondents 3 to 5, who are close relatives of the petitioner. From the allegations made in the writ petition, it is clear that the dispute between the parties is more or less a family dispute. Allegation of the petitioner is that the respondents are putting pressure on the petitioner to transfer his properties. Petitioner being a major person, we see no reason to believe such allegation. Petitioner is a fully matured person to guard the

W.P (C) No. 17074/2015 -:2:- interest regarding the property. It is not a fit case to issue any direction for police protection.

Writ petition is closed.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PS to Judge