K.V.Balakrishnan v. Krishnankutty

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/10TH MAGHA, 1936 SA.No. 904 of 2001 ( ) ----------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN A.S.NO. 95/2000 of II ADDITIONAL SUB COURT,THRISSUR DATED 18.06.2001 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN O.S.NO.49/1996 of MUNSIFF COURT, WADAKANCHERY DATED 30.08.1997 APPELLANT(S)/DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS:

------------------------ 1.

K.V.BALAKRISHNAN, SON OF VELAYUDHAN, KARUVAN VEETTIL, VALLATHOL NAGAR, CHERUTHURUTHY VILLAGE, P.O.CHERUTHURUTHY, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT. *2.

C.V.JACOB, SON OF CHAKKALAMUTTAH VARALAN VAREED, CHERUTHURUTHY VILLAGE, P.O.CHERUTHURUTHY, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.(LRS IMPLEADED) *ADDL.APPELLANTS:

ADDL.APPELLANT NO.3. C.A.ROSA, W/O.LATE C.V.JACOB, CHAKKALAMUTTATH HOUSE, POST CHERUTHURUTHY, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

ADDL.APPELLANT NO.4. MINI C.J., D/O.LATE C.V.JACOB, CHAKKALAMUTTATH HOUSE, POST CHERUTHURUTHY, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

ADDL.APPELLANT NO.5. MANOJ ANTONY, S/O.LATE C.V.JACOB, CHAKKALAMUTTATH HOUSE, POST CHERUTHURUTHY, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

ADDL.APPELLANT NO.6. YESUDAS C.J., S/O.LATE C.V.JACOB, CHAKKALAMUTTATH HOUSE, POST CHERUTHURUTHY, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF DECEASED APPELLANT NO.2 ARE IMPLEADED AS ADDITIONAL APPELLANTS 3 TO 6 AS PER SEPARATE ORDER DATED 2.6.2004 IN IA NO.382/2004.

A1 BY ADVS.SMT.PREETHY KARUNAKARAN SRI.R.RAJESH KORMATH SMT.BIJIMOL JOSE ADDL.A3 TO A6 BY ADVS.SRI.R.RAJESH KORMATH SMT.MEENA.A.

SMT.SANJANA R.NAIR SRI.JAYKAR.K.S.

SRI.RAHUL VARMA SRI.V.S.ROBIN

SA NO.904/2001 RESPONDENT(S)/PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT:

---------------------------- KRISHNANKUTTY, SON OF THANISSERI KRISHNAN, PANJAL VILLAGE, P.O.PAINKULAM, VIA.CHERUTHURUTHY, THALAPPILLY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.ASOK M.CHERIYAN THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 30-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

A.HARIPRASAD, J.

-------------------------------------- S.A. No.904 of 2001 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

In spite of giving opportunities, no step was taken to implead the legal heirs of deceased 1st appellant. Learned counsel submitted that though he contacted the parties, they did not turn up. The matter comes up in the defect list. Hence the appeal is dismissed for default. A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

cks

A.Hariprasad, J.

S.A.No.904 of 2001

JUDGMENT

30th January, 2015